Page 20 of 20

Re: Greenwood

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2023 3:31 pm
by Fuck the Glazers
FuB wrote: 5 months ago There was no way on earth they were going to let an asset that was worth a fortune prior to the charges go for nothing when they could potentially get a return by putting him back on the field away from Old Trafford. Welcome to Manchester United the business that plays a bit of football on the side.
I thought the sponsors didn't want anything to do with him so his value dropped. There are reports Saudi didn't want anything to do with him because he would tarnish their reputation lol in which case he's basically worthless.

But I guess that's wrong. If he's still a good / great player, he'll bang in the goals, that will dominate the headlines, the abuse will be history and he'll be worth a few quid.

I wouldn't even rule him out re-joining United, especially given how short we are up front. Maybe that's why we didn't go for a loan deal for a CF.

Re: Greenwood

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2023 4:43 pm
by dozer
Fuck the Glazers wrote: 5 months ago
FuB wrote: 5 months ago ...

I wouldn't even rule him out re-joining United, especially given how short we are up front. Maybe that's why we didn't go for a loan deal for a CF.
Why not a loan deal?
You think he'll rejoin us this season at Jan?

Re: Greenwood

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:46 pm
by dozer



Re: Greenwood

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 4:49 pm
by Fuck the Glazers
That's ace tbf :))

Shows what people inside the game think of him. Having him back would upset the dressing room. People forget footballers have morals. Most anyway.