A lot of you will rightly call me mad but I'd prefer the scousers over Abu Dhabi any day. Early days of Abu Dhabi when it was still a novelty, the idea of Liverpool coming back was too fucking annoying so I'd have taken City over them. But now I think there are much more important things going on in football and it's good to have a strong rival thay isn't strong by cheating their way into that position. I'd take Arsenal for the same reasons.Fuck the Glazers wrote: ↑3 weeks agoThey could, yeah. But it wouldn't mean anything if Liverpool didn't falter. If they're still as consistent as under Klopp, City are done.sheesh wrote: ↑4 weeks agoI still fancy them to go on a long winning run. They'll come good. But I think this will be Pep's last season at the club.Fuck the Glazers wrote: ↑4 weeks ago City lose 4 in a row. Pep has spoken in such uncharacteristically dire language recently that it's rubbing off on the players. After today's game it sounded like he conceded the title.
Pep doesn't play psychological games. I think the arse has genuinely fallen out of them.
Is it cos of Rodri or cos they're going to playing in the conference league next season? For me I can see it being the latter.
It'd mean Liverpool win 20 titles which is fucking painful. Worse than the state dopers winning it. But at least they did it without breaking 130 rules and having 12 other clubs to aid them.
Like I say, call me mad, I wouldn't have written that 30 years ago but football is absolutely a completely different beast now.
Obviously ideal scenario is none of them win it, but wr have to be realistic.